Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 883 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 31% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 181 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 28 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |