Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $102.36 vs $257.64
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $0.85 vs $2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3703 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
128
95.52238805970148%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
38.11659192825112%
Price, €
€285.98
39%
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |