Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G3258 - 178 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $37.55 vs $102.36
- Up to 58% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10320 - $0.27 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
42.1875%
Price, €
€113.62
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
155
87.07865168539325%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
39.83105912930474%
Multi-Core
1074
23.216601815823605%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |