Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $102.36 vs $488.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-9900 - $0.62 vs $2.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-10320 - 184 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
99.45652173913044%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1660 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.94/FPS
21.08843537414966%
Price, €
€541.68
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €541.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
95.53072625698324%
Multi-Core
4626
64.21432537479178%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |