Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $102.36 vs $318.79
- Up to 26% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-14900KF - $0.63 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 130% better in League of Legends than Core i3-10320 - 414 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
43.47826086956522%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1672 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
74.11764705882354%
Price, €
€353.86
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
49.51737451737452%
Multi-Core
4626
21.984602224123183%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |