Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $102.36 vs $164.51
- Up to 37% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-9700KF - $0.63 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-10320 - 183 vs 180 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
98.36065573770492%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1716 minutes ago
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
92.37695078031213%
Multi-Core
4626
65.09075559307725%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |