Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3623 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-875K - 187 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $87.75 vs $131.61
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-875K - $0.52 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |