Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 26% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i7-2600K - 149 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $62.15 vs $87.75
- Up to 11% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i3-10320 - $0.58 vs $0.65 per FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
118
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |