Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $102.36 vs $190.75
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-11700F - $0.61 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-10320 - 215 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
187
86.9767441860465%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
62.244897959183675%
Price, €
€211.73
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
73.25083293669681%
Multi-Core
4626
52.62798634812287%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |