Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Core i5-7500 - 180 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $65.07 vs $87.75
- Up to 24% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-10320 - $0.41 vs $0.54 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15273 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
176
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |