Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4690 - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $37.6 vs $87.75
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - $0.23 vs $0.51 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13347 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
183
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |