Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-4460 - 160 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $46.82 vs $87.75
- Up to 44% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10320 - $0.34 vs $0.61 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
155
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |