Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-2500 - 218 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - $102.36 vs $142.07
- Up to 31% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-2500 - $0.52 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2179 minutes ago
Buy for €157.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |