Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $102.36 vs $108.95
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - 293 vs 270 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - $0.41 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
270
92.15017064846417%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
97.61904761904762%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
293
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.93
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
62.816326530612244%
Multi-Core
4626
39.22998643147897%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |