Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 607 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100 - 60 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $87.75 vs $106.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-9100 - $1.62 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8345 minutes ago
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |