Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3250 - 207 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $41.2 vs $87.75
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - $0.24 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
191
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |