Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3930 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $64.34 vs $102.36
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10320 - $0.6 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
70.58823529411765%
Price, €
€113.62
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3716 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
119
88.80597014925374%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
39.50617283950617%
Multi-Core
1043
22.546476437527023%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |