Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 298 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - 124 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $65.8 vs $102.36
- Up to 36% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - $0.59 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
99.19354838709677%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
64.13043478260869%
Price, €
€113.62
64%
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
96.36819035691923%
Multi-Core
4626
67.19930273097037%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |