Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 219 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 1% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-10320 - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $91.4 vs $102.36
- Up to 11% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-10320 - $0.59 vs $0.66 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
99.4186046511628%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
89.39393939393938%
Price, €
€113.62
89%
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
98.9710610932476%
Multi-Core
4626
79.07692307692308%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |