Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 742 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 2600X - 227 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $108.95 vs $135.27
- Up to 21% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.53 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.93
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |