Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 244 vs 243 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $72.46 vs $102.36
- Up to 30% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10320 - $0.33 vs $0.47 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
70.21276595744682%
Price, €
€113.62
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1607 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
243
99.59016393442623%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1606 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |