Buy on Amazon
€120.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 3 1300X - 183 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $43.86 vs $108.95
- Up to 59% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-10320 - $0.27 vs $0.66 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
40%
Price, €
€120.93
40%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
179
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.68
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for €48.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.