Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 1200 - 178 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $102.36 vs $219.35
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.64 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
164
92.13483146067416%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
43.24324324324324%
Price, €
€243.48
46%
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
63.93762183235867%
Multi-Core
2834
61.26242974492002%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |