Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 34% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-8300 - 158 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than FX-8300 - $0.72 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $77.55 vs $102.36
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
74.68354430379746%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
98.63013698630137%
Price, €
€86.08
100%
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |