Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $145.55 vs $386.79
- Up to 62% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-14900F - $0.87 vs $2.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i3-10300 - 190 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
38%
Price, €
€429.34
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |