Buy on Amazon
€372.53
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Celeron G1620 - 176 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $35.83 vs $335.61
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-10300 (Base stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110300
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
26.13418530351438%
Multi-Core
723
15.078206465067778%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.