Buy on Amazon
€372.53
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 145 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $27.05 vs $335.61
- Up to 90% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-10300 - $0.25 vs $2.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.57/FPS
9.72762645914397%
Price, €
€372.53
8%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10300 (Base stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110300
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4228 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
122
84.13793103448276%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.22044728434505%
Multi-Core
739
15.411887382690303%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.