Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $145.55 vs $361.95
- Up to 59% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.91 vs $2.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10300 - 182 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.21/FPS
41%
Price, €
€401.76
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €401.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |