Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $72.39 vs $237.63
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.21 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10300 - 409 vs 386 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
386
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11544 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
409
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
32%
Price, €
€263.77
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €263.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |