Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $65.8 vs $159.16
- Up to 56% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.7 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10105T - 112 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
104
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12382 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
44%
Price, €
€176.67
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €176.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |