Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $65.8 vs $197.77
- Up to 63% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13600KF - $0.42 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105T - 193 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
173
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12383 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
36%
Price, €
€219.52
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |