Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 693 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $65.8 vs $84.08
- Up to 20% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-9100F - $0.66 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10105T - 113 vs 111 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
111
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12470 minutes ago
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |