Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G550 - 199 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10105T - $35.83 vs $65.8
- Up to 43% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10105T - $0.21 vs $0.37 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
56%
Price, €
€73.04
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
189
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |