Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 268 vs 259 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Ready or Not than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.25 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $59.8 vs $60.86
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |