Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i7-6900K - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $60.86 vs $87.75
- Up to 33% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6900K - $0.33 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |