Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 2054 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $60.86 vs $131.61
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6700K - $0.39 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - 176 vs 175 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |