Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $59.66 vs $213.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-13700F - $0.38 vs $1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10105F - 206 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
85.43689320388349%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
33.04347826086957%
Price, €
€237.41
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
54.64111236377301%
Multi-Core
4472
28.89822294022617%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |