Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $60.86 vs $155.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - $0.24 vs $0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i3-10105F - 279 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
38%
Price, €
€172.05
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |