Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Core i3-7100 - 713 vs 690 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $32.17 vs $60.86
- Up to 44% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-10105F - $0.05 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
713
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
55%
Price, €
€67.56
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
690
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |