Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2878 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 350 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-6350 - $71.78 vs $73.12
- Up to 20% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - $0.2 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
350
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |