Buy on Amazon
€71.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Celeron G3900 - 227 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $29.18 vs $64.1
- Up to 52% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-10105 - $0.15 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €71.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
214
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.