Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-8320 - 277 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $54.71 vs $63.19
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €70.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74578 minutes ago
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |