Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $53.75 vs $307.06
- Up to 81% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-13900F - $0.08 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Rocket League than Core i3-10100 - 793 vs 717 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
717
90.41614123581337%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
793
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
18.6046511627907%
Price, €
€340.84
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €340.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
52.23443223443224%
Multi-Core
4215
24.47877344793542%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |