Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4670S - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $40.41 vs $67.96
- Up to 39% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10100 - $0.38 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €75.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |