Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $68.54 vs $121.27
- Up to 38% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11600KF - $0.58 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10100 - 144 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19552 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
62%
Price, €
€134.61
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €134.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |