Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 6% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 115 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $68.54 vs $80.42
- Up to 20% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.66 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €76.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12988 minutes ago
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12989 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |