Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $68.54 vs $109.68
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.14 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10100 - 592 vs 561 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
561
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
592
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
66%
Price, €
€121.75
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |