Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 181 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than FX-8320 - $50.44 vs $54.71
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €55.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74117 minutes ago
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |