Buy on Amazon
€75.94
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-4130 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $16.76 vs $68.41
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-10100 - $0.1 vs $0.4 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-10100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110100
Buy for €75.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10100
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.