Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $36.56 vs $168.17
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G6900 - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
73.83694150161216%
Multi-Core
2696
29.39701232144804%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |